(Website Modified 17 July 2026)
Firestick Estate Inc’s “…informed and science based advocacy…” for the mitigation of extreme bushfires in Australia, is explained in the book “mass murder” and the coverups, endorsed by a senior MP:
We believe this unconditional endorsement, by a senior Australian Government Shadow Minister, who entered Parliament after the Black Saturday Fires in 2009, was supported by the Government and Opposition. In our opinion, they could not say it in writing, because of a well founded fear about being individually blamed for their failures, before and after the Black Saturday Fire’s deaths.
Almost two years later, after the senior MP’s unconditional endorsement, a 34 minute Audio Review of the book – untainted by Australian media’s undisclosed conflicts of interest – raised a paradigm changing perspective. The Audio Review expressed a legal opinion, that when the Prime Minister – supported by his Attorney-General (Australia’s first Law Officer) – used the words “mass murder”, it established a legal and moral intent for the deaths from the 2009 Black Saturday Fires, in which:
“…173 Australians burned to death in a single afternoon…the Prime Minister went on national television and called the deaths mass murder…when a leader uses a phrase like mass murder, they are legally and morally establishing intent…the catastrophe was actually engineered in air conditioned government offices through ignored science, manipulated data, and just a fundamental refusal to manage the landscape” (0:00 – 1:15 minutes).
The Audio Review then provides an objective overview on nine other issues:
1. Firstly, the scientific definition of fuel:
“…fuel refers exclusively to the completely dry dead biomass resting on the forest floor…the shed leaves, the dry grass, the peeling bark, and the broken twigs that are less than 6 mm in diameter…the fate of an entire continent comes down to thermodynamics” (3:50 – 4:15 minutes).
2. The government’s warning system failures:
“When a community’s warning system is fundamentally broken, the public’s ability to survive is stripped away…Because the models were wrong, people died in their driveways. They died in their cars trying to outrun a fire front that arrived hours before the official government timeline said it would” (9:48 – 10:35 minutes).
3. The government’s plausible deniability rule:
“It is the ability of a senior official, a cabinet minister, or a prime minister to credibly claim that they had absolutely no knowledge of or responsibility for a disastrous failure within their own government…It is a wall of wilful ignorance…”(16:43 – 17:32 minutes).
4. The Australian Government Attorney-General’s strategic error:
“You cannot stand before a judge or a royal commission and say we didn’t know the models were lethal, when your own attorney general’s letter proves you were studying the exact data that proved they were lethal…If you know the fuel is explosive and you know the fire will travel at 24 kilometres an hour and you know your Public Evacuation warnings are only set for nine kilometres an hour and you wilfully choose to do nothing and then citizens die. That is the definition of negligence” (19:28 – 20:15minutes).
5. The government’s warning video Don’t Wait and See:
“…buried within the specific risk analysis data that informed this government endorsed project was a single horrifying statistic…a secret internal estimate projected 8,000 deaths…our current forest management policies could result in 8,000 of you burning to death…The public is going to…demand that you change the policy immediately…returning to the indigenous practices of prescribed cool burning” (21:30 – 22:35 minutes).
6. The government’s holocaust plan (Residual Risk):
“…the prioritisation of a very specific modern environmental narrative over the protection of human life…the illusion that a pristine untouched forest was a safe forest. Acknowledging the secret 8,000 death estimate would have instantly shattered that illusion” (24:20 – 24:40 minutes).
7. The government’s media propaganda buster:
“…the campaign finally found a crack in the media wall…The Weekly Times began looking at the data the campaign was providing…as propaganda busters…actually look at the physics…the government was essentially supervising an arson infrastructure. It is the ultimate negligence…14 years of concealment, delegation, and plausible deniability engineered by the government…the very bureaucratic agencies that claimed they were the protectors of biodiversity ultimately oversaw the greatest mass casualty of wildlife in the continent’s modern history…” (27:00 – 30:54 minutes).
8. Firestick Estate’s 2026 Victory:
“…the relentless pressure…finally achieved the goal…two landmark paradigm shifting articles were published in The Australian and The Age…I want to read a direct quote from the article in The Australian because it feels like the thesis statement of this entire ‘deep dive’:
Australia was an artefact created by Aborigines with their fire sticks. This is a land that burns. For as long as humans have walked it, it always has. Climate shapes the weather, but fuel shapes the fire. We neglect this abiding truth at our peril.
After 14 years of evasion, the campaign successfully forced the national media and the political apparatus to…the undeniable physics of fuel management and the vital proven necessity of indigenous wisdom. They won the argument” (31:00 – 32:30 minutes).
9. Finally, other issues, like COVID, the first sentence in the book (page 17):
“If a single fundamental mathematical truth, the difference between a fire moving at 9 kilometres an hour and 24 kilometres an hour, can be suppressed and buried for years just to protect a government agency from liability, at the cost of hundreds of human lives and three billion animals…what other crises in our world right now that we are told are just unavoidable tragedies are actually manufactured disasters? Whether it is a failing public health infrastructure, a collapsing power grid, or a localised environmental crisis, how many of these acts of God are just acts of administrative negligence waiting for a dedicated group of experts to build a 14-year paper trail and expose them” (32:18 – 34:05 minutes).